On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 18:42:10 +0200, Martin Sourada <martin.sourada@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 11:12 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 17:26:29 +0200, > > Martin Sourada <martin.sourada@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > It would help to list which spins went oversize and what's their target > > > size. So general info: > > > > broffice and xfce are the two that went over their targets. They need to > > get back under 703 MiB. Games was almost hit, but still has enough cushion > > that I can handle the hedgewars small increase in size which will be > > showing up in a push tomorrow unless it gets negative karma before then. > > But I'm still pretty close and will probably still implement whatever > > we do for broffice and xfce. > > > AFAIK XFCE should require only -single, unless they pull > gnome-desktop(3) for some reason. That grew by 1MB, probably due to > increased complexity of the wallpaper. I'd investigate this one more > throughout if I were you. That will be lower priority for me. Kevin knows that package better and the solution there doesn't help broffice, whereas working on a general solution will help xfce in the short run, even if there is also another problem that can be fixed. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
