On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 16:11 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Tue, 13.04.10 15:04, Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > >>> What does that bug report to do with the firewall and the desktop live > >>> cd? > >> > >> having avahi running and active by default. > >> > >> if various tools dep on the lib, then a system won't end up with avahi > >> installed and running by default. The above is something of a surprise to > >> many folks running servers. > >> > >> the comment from JH is the admin/manager of kernel.org who was a bit > >> frustrated by avahi running as a service. > > > > Right. And what does that have to do with the firewall of the desktop > > live cd? > > > > I mean, i am not opposed to introducing a seperate package for the avahi > > libs, but i wonder what that has to do with the firewall of the desktop > > live cd? > > > > And mentioning an admin's tale about a server is not really to the point is > > it? > > > > Perhaps I misread the original comment - but it was the suggestion of > having avahi running by default. > > Do you mean having that be the case from the livecd or from the package > itself. > > If the former, then you're right it's a side issue. I thought the latter > was being discussed which is why I brought up that report. Nope, it's the former that's being discussed. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
