On Tue, 13.04.10 15:04, Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > What does that bug report to do with the firewall and the desktop live > > cd? > > having avahi running and active by default. > > if various tools dep on the lib, then a system won't end up with avahi > installed and running by default. The above is something of a surprise to > many folks running servers. > > the comment from JH is the admin/manager of kernel.org who was a bit > frustrated by avahi running as a service. Right. And what does that have to do with the firewall of the desktop live cd? I mean, i am not opposed to introducing a seperate package for the avahi libs, but i wonder what that has to do with the firewall of the desktop live cd? And mentioning an admin's tale about a server is not really to the point is it? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
