On Tue, 13.04.10 14:35, Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > Heya, > > > > It seems to me that Avahi would be safe to run by default. That would > > allow accessing remote machines through their .local names, even if it > > wouldn't solve the problem of sharing *from* the machine itself. > > > > But it would mean we can SSH, or VNC into local area machines, and > > consume data (shares, music, etc.). > > > > Comments? > > > I think if this request is fulfilled then making avahi default on would be > okay. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530087 > > but only AFTER that request is filled. > > how does that sound? What does that bug report to do with the firewall and the desktop live cd? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
