Rahul Sundaram (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Odd, the wiki page says 9 and 7 people, respectively. (The Desktop SIG > > page lists 11.) > > Are you seriously suggesting that they are on the same level? No, I'm saying that when the XFCE and LXDE SIGs say they have 7-10 members each, how am I supposed to know that they actually have only one or two active development members, as you state? I'm not psychic. > >> The kernel team could be doing things better. > > > > And yet, you're not constantly badgering them. (Or the installer team, > > or...) > > > > That's what I'm talking about here - you and others are essentially holding > > the Desktop SIG to a standard, of your creation, that moves over time, that > > you don't actually hold anyone else to, including the SIGs you're actually > > a part of! > > > > I find that kind of hypocritical, toxic, behavior frustrating and silly. > > I care about the desktop a LOT more than the kernel or installer. How is > the hypocritical? You stated that a group is 'clearly flawed and desperately in need of change' when they're not following a process that you don't follow in your own SIGs. I can't read that as anything other than hypocritical. If you care about it a lot more, how about working to enact some of these changes (summaries to fedora-devel-list, for example), rather than constantly complaining? Bill -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
