On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:52 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:50 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > > That's what I'm talking about here - you and others are essentially holding > > the Desktop SIG to a standard, of your creation, that moves over time, that > > you don't actually hold anyone else to, including the SIGs you're actually > > a part of! > > > > I find that kind of hypocritical, toxic, behavior frustrating and silly. > > Alternatively, we could take it as a sign the our stuff is the one > people actually care about, because it is in they face unlike the > kernel... I think it's more accurate to say that it's rare for any particular kernel change to affect more than a few people in a way they actually notice as a jarring change, while it's much more common for changes to the behaviour or appearance of the desktop used by the majority of our users to have that effect. Just the different nature of the components. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
