On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 15:01 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 09:18 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 23:55 -0800, Peter Gordon wrote: > > > I propose that we *do* have it as default for the Alpha and Beta and if > > > it comes to a point, similar to the F10 trials, where it's still too > > > rough, that we can simply fallback (again) to Pidgin for another > > > release. I sincerely hope that this is not the case, though. ;-) > > > > If you're going to do that again, you're really going to need to nail > > down a set of criteria for "pass" vs "fail" so that QA et al can better > > help make that judgment call. It was entirely too wishy washy last time > > around. > > For starters, it would be nice if the people who rejected it the last > time around would log their reasons for doing so on the feature page... I've added some of my concerns to the discussion page, but I'll try to fleshed it out a bit more this weekend. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
