Re: Alpha checkpoint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 09:18 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 23:55 -0800, Peter Gordon wrote:
> >  I propose that we *do* have it as default for the Alpha and Beta and if
> > it comes to a point, similar to the F10 trials, where it's still too
> > rough, that we can simply fallback (again) to Pidgin for another
> > release. I sincerely hope that this is not the case, though. ;-)
> 
> If you're going to do that again, you're really going to need to nail
> down a set of criteria for "pass" vs "fail" so that QA et al can better
> help make that judgment call.  It was entirely too wishy washy last time
> around.

For starters, it would be nice if the people who rejected it the last
time around would log their reasons for doing so on the feature page...

-- 
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux