Re: Alpha checkpoint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 23:55 -0800, Peter Gordon wrote:
>  I propose that we *do* have it as default for the Alpha and Beta and if
> it comes to a point, similar to the F10 trials, where it's still too
> rough, that we can simply fallback (again) to Pidgin for another
> release. I sincerely hope that this is not the case, though. ;-)

If you're going to do that again, you're really going to need to nail
down a set of criteria for "pass" vs "fail" so that QA et al can better
help make that judgment call.  It was entirely too wishy washy last time
around.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux