On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 07:51 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > By having a much tighter focus we need to revisit some our goals. Just for historical background of a few of these (not saying we shouldn't revisit them, but so everyone starts on the same page so to speak) > This includes goals like "is it important it fits on CD media", Feedback from non-US/non-European based locales is that CD media is still very important. The fact that the "Fedora spin" is DVD only gets a reasonable amount of flak, but it tends to be deflected with "go use the live CD" :) > "should we include all locales or have regional variants", Regional variants implies a need for more storage and more testing time. That's the historical thinking anyway > "do we support multi-lib out of the box". The processor vendors are *huge* fans of this and users _who take advantage of it_ are also. The argument is that without the 32bit-ness available and there with no intervention needed, you might as well switch to a different arch altogether. Jeremy -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
