On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 12:24:04AM -0600, Bryan Livingston wrote: > >I agree that the traditional hierarchy isn't all that obvious, but it's not > >all that bad either. The way forward isn't incremental mucking with what > >things are called, but in rethinking the basic assumptions of the model. > >(Start with "why a hierarchy?") > Doing away with the hierarchy reminds me of the way that macs try to > sweep the actual file system under the rug and hide it behind a gui. > That might be fine for dumb end users but as a power user it totally > turns me off. So, you'd rather paper-over with renamings. *shrug*. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
