> Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:00:30 -0700 > From: Michael Knepher <mknepher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora-desktop-list Digest, Vol 6, Issue 11 Ops, sorry about that one... > To: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop > <fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1092412830.20259.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 12:05 +0200, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:50:09 -0400 > > > From: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Currently Evolution 1.5.* stores its data (contacts, calendar, email > > > etc) below the ~/.evolution directory and in GConf, and makes various > > > assumptions about the layout of the ~/.evolution directory. Evolution > > > could be changed to follow this proposal for "local contacts" (as > > > opposed to contacts found on e.g. a shared corporate LDAP database), but > > > it'd be non-trivial. > > > > > > > What? How do i transfer my mail that is currently in my evo folder? I > > dont want to loose it! > > > > Only thing kept in .evolution before was passwords and mailservers > > The new Evolution will import all your old mail, contacts, calendar > items, etc., on first startup. > How? Just copy the evo folder into my ~? What will then happen to my evolution-folder? Just imported and then never touched again? > > Another point: Webbrowsing. Today FC uses moz - which has a nice engine > > etc. But Epiphany is still better integrated with Gnome (and no > > difference when talking HTML engine): Why not use this as the standard > > web-browser instead? > > Check out some of the newer builds of mozilla - there's a lot of gtk2 > integration going in that makes it fit in the desktop better appearance- > wise. Here's a screenshot showing mozilla using the gtk+2.4 file > chooser: > http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings/images/mozilla_pango.png > That is good. Even if i can't se the big diff. Cant read that language anyway :) > > > > Only prob. as far as i can see, is that neither moz or epiphany has a > > user-friendly way to select which printer you want to use. Whic is... > > BAD! > > > > For epiphany, it should be a fairly simple matter. I'm not sure what's > involved with getting mozilla/firefox to use the new print system. > > > What new print system? CUPS? It is really un-user-friendly the way it is now. Even KDE does better than that! (joke, not flamebait). But i still cant see why we are using moz not epiphany (apart from being completely unpronounceable, and the word also un-understandable...)? Decision-makers: please answer (or somebody else who knows the truth) -- Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
