I like this idea. I'm not sure if a screensaver like this exists - but how about including a slideshow screensaver, one that cycles through images in a directory with some nice transitional effects [don't ask me to program this though hehe]. Since this probably won't eat much cpu at all, it would make a very nice choice for the screensavers-base package. On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 22:20, Mike Fedyk wrote: > Ray Strode wrote: > > >On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 21:27 -0300, Steven Garrity wrote: > > > > > >>So, as this thread illustrates, there are plenty of opinions on the > >>screensavers. > >> > >>Perhaps someone with the authority/ability can make a call on this based > >>on the various options floated on this thread and go ahead with it. > >> > >> > >So what I'm going to end up doing is making the base xscreensaver > >package have a small number of screensavers, and then have an additional > >package for the more fancy ones. > > > How about a four way split (feel free to come up with better names)? > > screensavers-base > screensavers-3d > screensavers-pretty (all judged to be better than the ones in misc) > screensavers-misc (all of the ones you'd love to leave out completely) > > Now let's nominate some screensavers that are not resource intensive > (ie, not 3d and don't take up more than say 25% CPU on a computer 3-4 > years old) and pleasing to the eye to make a list totaling 10 or less. > I can think of some now, but can't think of their name right now. > > So, what say you? -- Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
