Ray Strode wrote:
On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 21:27 -0300, Steven Garrity wrote:
So, as this thread illustrates, there are plenty of opinions on the screensavers.So what I'm going to end up doing is making the base xscreensaver
Perhaps someone with the authority/ability can make a call on this based on the various options floated on this thread and go ahead with it.
package have a small number of screensavers, and then have an additional
package for the more fancy ones.
How about a four way split (feel free to come up with better names)?
screensavers-base screensavers-3d screensavers-pretty (all judged to be better than the ones in misc) screensavers-misc (all of the ones you'd love to leave out completely)
Now let's nominate some screensavers that are not resource intensive (ie, not 3d and don't take up more than say 25% CPU on a computer 3-4 years old) and pleasing to the eye to make a list totaling 10 or less. I can think of some now, but can't think of their name right now.
So, what say you?
-- Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
