On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 14:18, Brian Pepple wrote: > On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 13:48, Colin Walters wrote: > > > What I'm curious of is comments by people who still use XMMS, and why. > > What are the most important things to you that need to be fixed in > > Rhythmbox? > > I still use XMMS, since it's less CPU intensive than Rhythmbox. On an > older machine Rhythmbox, tends to use too much resources. True. There's a few senses of "removal" - removal from the package set entirely, and just removal from the default installation, and removal from the default menu. I'm really only talking about the latter.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
