On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 13:48, Colin Walters wrote: > What I'm curious of is comments by people who still use XMMS, and why. > What are the most important things to you that need to be fixed in > Rhythmbox? I still use XMMS, since it's less CPU intensive than Rhythmbox. On an older machine Rhythmbox, tends to use too much resources. /B -- Brian Pepple <bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
