On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 18:34 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: > Máirín Duffy wrote: > > > > Using this, here's my stab at an initial (albeit sparse) set > > of guidelines: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/2/29/Fedora_secondary_logo_draft_guidelines.png > > I like it, +1 > > The only change I can think of is putting the "light background" section > at the top. I believe you put "dark background" at the top for symmetry > with the red at the bottom, but I believe the white background/blue > logotype will be the most used (and preferred), so is better to have it > at the top. I think OLPC is waiting on us for this logo, so if I can get it to them on Saturday, that would be great -- we're trying to make it into their update build so that we can have this logo appear on a million machines in the next year. What's the verdict? -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
