O/H Steven Garrity έγραψε: > Nicu Buculei wrote: >> May I ask which license is recommended by FSF for artwork? Or which >> licenses for artwork are compatible with the GPL? >> >> We have heard from a long time from CreativeCommons supporters that >> GPL is not a good license for artwork, being by design a license for >> code not for art (and this sound reasonable, we can't really talk >> about the source code of a PNG or OGG). > > > The next version of the CC licenses should be released soon (within a > month, I heard at the Desktop Developers Conference last week). I > understand the updates are intended to address some of these > incompatibilities with GPL. I'm sure the Tango people would like their work to be compatible with the GPL. Probably you should ask their position about this, since it would be great if we could include it in GPL applications in Fedora. -dim > > That said, I don't really know what I'm talking about. > > Cheers, > Steven Garrity > > _______________________________________________ > > @xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ -- Dimitris Glezos Jabber ID: glezos@xxxxxxxxxx, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B http://dimitris.glezos.com/ "He who gives up functionality for ease of use loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous) -- _______________________________________________ @xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
