--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:26:55PM +0100, Martin Eriksson wrote: > I was just wondering how Ext3 and Reiserfs compare. When I reinstalled my > server (because of a stupid hacker) I took the opportunity to change to > ReiserFS. And I have to say it's really much faster than Ext3. >=20 > So what's some highlights on Ext3 vs. ReiserFS? I guess the Ext2 compabil= ity > is one large factor for using Ext3, but otherwise? I ran some benchmarks recently to test performance of several Linux filesystems under heavey synchronous load (ie a mail server). For this, ext3 data=3Djournal was nearly twice as fast as ReiserFS. See http://bruce-guenter.dyndns.org/benchmarking/ --=20 Bruce Guenter <bruceg@em.ca> http://em.ca/~bruceg/ http://untroubled.org/ OpenPGP key: 699980E8 / D0B7 C8DD 365D A395 29DA 2E2A E96F B2DC 6999 80E8 --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8R7aE6W+y3GmZgOgRAvM9AJ9Erm85qOm0r6hWSy7Qg84LBftUWwCfQ2MW G2m4abFAPees8Y7icY/E/Os= =tLXh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--
