Craig Tierney wrote: > > I am using ext3 on my production systems. My interests lie more in > large file performance that small file performance. In this situation > Reiser did not perform well. I was seeing 20-30 MB/s for a ResierFs system, > but ext3 was giving me 70 MB/s for reads and 100 MB/s for writes. > > All reports I have read say that Reiser is very good at small files. You see > this during your kernel makes. Hi, You can find benchs reiserfs vs. ext3 on http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks/benchmark-results.html I did also similar benchs: http://www.linux-france.org/article/sys/ext3fs/Benchmarks/benchmark-mongo-2.txt and http://www.linux-france.org/article/sys/ext3fs/Benchmarks/index.html (this one is in French) Best regards, Liu
