Ext3 vs. Reiser?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Craig Tierney wrote:
> 
> I am using ext3 on my production systems.  My interests lie more in
> large file performance that small file performance.  In this situation
> Reiser did not perform well.  I was seeing 20-30 MB/s for a ResierFs system,
> but ext3 was giving me 70 MB/s for reads and 100 MB/s for writes.
> 
> All reports I have read say that Reiser is very good at small files.  You see
> this during your kernel makes.

try to look this:
http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0112.0/1241.html

regards,





[Index of Archives]         [Linux RAID]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Postgresql]     [Fedora]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux