Craig Dickson wrote: > Dr. Tweedie said in this thread that as of the time that Red Hat froze > 7.2, ReiserFS was not stable enough. And that matches my recollection of > the state of ReiserFS at that time, also. Well, I was trying to meet our poster "half-way." ReiserFS is _quite_UNstable_ with a variety of various, "standard" Linux interfaces and services. So I'm sure RedHat views it as "not stable enough" for these reasons _because_ it has clients (like myself) using them. > I also seem to recall that SuSE took a lot of heat for the problems of > their first ReiserFS release. I think anyone familiar with the issue > would agree that they included ReiserFS support too soon; waiting > another minor release or two would probably have been better for them. Heck, I'm still surprised it went into kernel 2.4.1. -- Bryan -- Bryan J. Smith, Engineer mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org AbsoluteValue Systems, Inc. http://www.linux-wlan.org SmithConcepts, Inc. http://www.SmithConcepts.com --------------------------------------------------------- 1999 IRS Data: The top 1% of income earners pay over 36% of the taxes, but have less than 20% of the total income.
