--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable begin Bryan J. Smith quotation: > > I say yes, I agree. In addition, I understand that SuSE is interested in > > the same enterprise customers that you are, with the same concerns for > > reliability, and somehow they had ReiserFS in their kernel, that is what > > made me wonder. I am sure they have the same concerns about supporting > > ReiserFS if it buggy than RedHat does. >=20 > I don't think anyone is arguing that ReiserFS is "too buggy," [...] Dr. Tweedie said in this thread that as of the time that Red Hat froze 7.2, ReiserFS was not stable enough. And that matches my recollection of the state of ReiserFS at that time, also. I also seem to recall that SuSE took a lot of heat for the problems of their first ReiserFS release. I think anyone familiar with the issue would agree that they included ReiserFS support too soon; waiting another minor release or two would probably have been better for them. Craig --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8XwZCTv3a2fa7g4sRAgRqAJ9gF7Sn5Kwamtb8YKcCUgjZtWJ4vQCbBb10 TbkeX7yy5+eFAHdychqYhnU= =aplS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--
