?? ?? wrote: > I am using it for file-server, mail-spool, print-server, and nfs-server. > Many clients are accessing to it. Then latency is more important feature. > > Huuum. > I decided that mode=orderd is the best choce. :-) > > How about a journal size? > Default value is the best choice? I would not say so. A simpler way is to run mke2fs with a -n, send the output across to the list. On the other hand, assuming a ordered journal and a blocksize of 4K, 8192 blocks imply 36MB for the journal. I would suggest assuming an average disk usage of 50%, start with 256 MB for the journal size. Disclaimer: This is a back of envelope calculation. You can always change it later using tune2fs -J size=nnn, where nnn i fs blocks. Regards Amit FYI: You reply-to email address does not show up correcly in english mail clients, I use mozilla on x86 linux and your name shows up in a non-english characters.