On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 09:57:40PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 1 April 2015 at 21:34, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 1 April 2015 at 18:30, Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 05:15:13PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > >>> Missing definition and unused since their introduction. > >>> > >>> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> NAK > >> > >> I use all this in tools to debug lockup. Best course of action is to > >> exclude bof.h from being distributed. My tools static link and i just > >> point them to libdrm git tree. > >> > > Did not notice any mention of such out-of-tree tools in the commit > > that introduced these functions, so I've naively assumed that they are > > unused. > Scratch that - I'm blind. > > Upon closer look at your radeondb repo, I cannot see any static > linking in there. Also it seems that some of the functionality is > duplicated between the two. With the radeondb version being out of > date :'( Yeah i guess i never pushed anywhere patches that did that, divergence btw my memory and what is out there. All this symbol can just be hidden and never exported. It would cleaner, but i still need the bof.h intact as i tend to just cp it afaict into my local radeondb copy so that i am in sync with libdrm code. Cheers, Jérôme > > -Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel