Hi Jammy, All, On 21 January 2015 at 23:04, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Maarten Lankhorst > <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hey, >> >> On 21-01-15 17:16, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Maarten Lankhorst >>> <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Op 21-01-15 om 11:35 schreef Jammy Zhou: >>>>> When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcuy, >>>>> is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled. >>>>> >>>>> Return '1' for idle and '0' for busy if the specified timeout is '0' >>>>> to keep consistent with the case of non-zero timeout. >>>>> >>>>> v2: call fence_put if not signaled in the case of timeout==0 >>>>> >>>>> v3: switch to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou@xxxxxxx> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>> Reviewed-By: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Dave, Maarten, >>> >>> Do you want to pick these up, or would you rather I pulled them through my tree? >> This goes through Sumit Semwal's tree. He's the dma-buf maintainer and I already made him aware of the patches. > Both these patches are now pulled and pushed out to my for-next branch. > > Thanks! > > Alex -- Thanks and Best regards, Sumit. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
