Hey, On 21-01-15 17:16, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Maarten Lankhorst > <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Op 21-01-15 om 11:35 schreef Jammy Zhou: >>> When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcuy, >>> is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled. >>> >>> Return '1' for idle and '0' for busy if the specified timeout is '0' >>> to keep consistent with the case of non-zero timeout. >>> >>> v2: call fence_put if not signaled in the case of timeout==0 >>> >>> v3: switch to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou@xxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> >>> >> Reviewed-By: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Dave, Maarten, > > Do you want to pick these up, or would you rather I pulled them through my tree? This goes through Sumit Semwal's tree. He's the dma-buf maintainer and I already made him aware of the patches. ~Maarten _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
