On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hey, > > On 21-01-15 17:16, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Maarten Lankhorst >> <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Op 21-01-15 om 11:35 schreef Jammy Zhou: >>>> When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcuy, >>>> is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled. >>>> >>>> Return '1' for idle and '0' for busy if the specified timeout is '0' >>>> to keep consistent with the case of non-zero timeout. >>>> >>>> v2: call fence_put if not signaled in the case of timeout==0 >>>> >>>> v3: switch to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou@xxxxxxx> >>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> >>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> >>>> >>> Reviewed-By: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Dave, Maarten, >> >> Do you want to pick these up, or would you rather I pulled them through my tree? > This goes through Sumit Semwal's tree. He's the dma-buf maintainer and I already made him aware of the patches. Thanks! Alex _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel