On 20/03/2025 18:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 05:11:20PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
On 20/03/2025 09:14, Ling Xu wrote:
The fastrpc driver has support for 5 types of remoteprocs. There are
some products which support GPDSP remoteprocs. Add changes to support
GPDSP remoteprocs.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ling Xu <quic_lxu5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
index 7b7a22c91fe4..80aa554b3042 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@
#define SDSP_DOMAIN_ID (2)
#define CDSP_DOMAIN_ID (3)
#define CDSP1_DOMAIN_ID (4)
-#define FASTRPC_DEV_MAX 5 /* adsp, mdsp, slpi, cdsp, cdsp1 */
+#define GDSP0_DOMAIN_ID (5)
+#define GDSP1_DOMAIN_ID (6)
We have already made the driver look silly here, Lets not add domain ids for
each instance, which is not a scalable.
Domain ids are strictly for a domain not each instance.
Then CDSP1 should also be gone, correct?
Its already gone as part of the patch that I shared in this discussion.
I will send a proper patch to list once Ling/Ekansh has agree with it.
--srini
