On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 09:12:45AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:13 AM Langyan Ye > <yelangyan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Add "csot" to the Devicetree Vendor Prefix Registry. > > > > Signed-off-by: Langyan Ye <yelangyan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > > index 42d14899d584..375f1f7c79ef 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > > @@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ patternProperties: > > description: Crystalfontz America, Inc. > > "^csky,.*": > > description: Hangzhou C-SKY Microsystems Co., Ltd > > + "^csot,.*": > > + description: Guangzhou China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd > > Doing a `git log` on > `Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml` shows that > most patches use the subject prefix `dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes`, > not `dt-bindings: vendor`. If device-tree folks care about this > difference and they don't want to fix it when applying, they might > request you to send a new version. > > In any case, that's fairly minor so I'm OK with: > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I would assume this will go through the DT tree, not drm-misc. If this > is wrong then someone should shout. idk, probably the whole series should go together via drm-misc. %subject can change if there's a resubmission, otherwise Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
