Hi, On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:13 AM Langyan Ye <yelangyan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add "csot" to the Devicetree Vendor Prefix Registry. > > Signed-off-by: Langyan Ye <yelangyan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > index 42d14899d584..375f1f7c79ef 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > @@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ patternProperties: > description: Crystalfontz America, Inc. > "^csky,.*": > description: Hangzhou C-SKY Microsystems Co., Ltd > + "^csot,.*": > + description: Guangzhou China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd Doing a `git log` on `Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml` shows that most patches use the subject prefix `dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes`, not `dt-bindings: vendor`. If device-tree folks care about this difference and they don't want to fix it when applying, they might request you to send a new version. In any case, that's fairly minor so I'm OK with: Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> I would assume this will go through the DT tree, not drm-misc. If this is wrong then someone should shout. -Doug
