On Fri Jan 24, 2025 at 3:00 PM EET, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > On 1/24/25 2:16 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri Jan 24, 2025 at 10:12 AM EET, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> Gitlab as an open-source software project (the community edition) is one > >> thing, but can we please avoid advertising specific proprietary services > >> in the kernel documentation ? > > > > I don't think we should have any of this in the mainline kernel. > > > > One angle is that "no regressions rule" applies also to the shenanigans. > > > > Do we really spend energy on this proprietary crap to the eternity? > > This is not getting included into the kernel itself, the contributed code is, > of course, open-source. And yes it would execute just fine on the fully > open-source community-edition GitLab. I don't think "no regressions rule" > should apply here. This is for developers only, and is a template for making > your own pipeline mostly, with pieces which can be reused. Ah, OK then it is fine. It was a kernel list so I assumed it was for kernel. Then: I don't care about this ;-) I use a different testing tool (BuildRoot) and a different CI (Woodpecker in my local server). So go ahead and do what you like... > > Nick BR, Jarkko
