On 1/24/25 2:16 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri Jan 24, 2025 at 10:12 AM EET, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> Gitlab as an open-source software project (the community edition) is one >> thing, but can we please avoid advertising specific proprietary services >> in the kernel documentation ? > > I don't think we should have any of this in the mainline kernel. > > One angle is that "no regressions rule" applies also to the shenanigans. > > Do we really spend energy on this proprietary crap to the eternity? This is not getting included into the kernel itself, the contributed code is, of course, open-source. And yes it would execute just fine on the fully open-source community-edition GitLab. I don't think "no regressions rule" should apply here. This is for developers only, and is a template for making your own pipeline mostly, with pieces which can be reused. Nick
