On Thu, 09 Jan 2025, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 04:30:20PM +0900, Zhenyu Wang wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 12:25:09AM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >> > Note: zhenyuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx's address bounces: >> > >> >> yeah, I've left Intel so can't use that box any more, looks Rodrigo hasn't >> queue up my address change patch yet. Rodrigo? > > pushed to drm-intel-next now, although I was assuming this to come > on a gvt pull request... > > what about this patch here? coming in a PR or should I take this > directly at drm-intel-next as well? AFAICT the last gvt-next pull request was more than two years ago and gvt-fixes slightly less than one year ago. There's a single cleanup commit in gvt-next applied two years ago for which there hasn't been a pull request. The GVT github page [1] says, "This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 3, 2024. It is now read-only." The intel-gvt-dev mailing list [2] appears to be mostly spam. Seems to me something like this would be appropriate: diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 1c3eab5d2b1a..161206fdaf05 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -11557,11 +11557,10 @@ F: drivers/gpio/gpio-tangier.h INTEL GVT-g DRIVERS (Intel GPU Virtualization) M: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw.linux@xxxxxxxxx> M: Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@xxxxxxxxx> -L: intel-gvt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx L: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -S: Supported +S: Maintained W: https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux/wiki -T: git https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux.git +T: git https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel.git F: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/ INTEL HID EVENT DRIVER But I don't think it would be far from the truth to have "S: Odd Fixes" either. And the extreme would be to just remove the whole maintainers entry and have it fall back to the i915 entry. Thoughts? BR, Jani. [1] https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux/ [2] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gvt-dev/ -- Jani Nikula, Intel
