Hi Helen
On 12/4/2024 11:14 AM, Helen Mae Koike Fornazier wrote:
Hi Abhinav,
Thanks for your patch.
---- On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:55:17 -0300 Abhinav Kumar wrote ---
> From the jobs [1] and [2] of pipeline [3], its clear that
> kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo is most certainly a flake and
> not a fail for apq8016. Mark the test accordingly to match the results.
>
> [1] : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/67676481
> [2] : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/67677430
> [3]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/pipelines/1322770
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..18639853f18f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +# Board Name: msm-apq8016-db410c
> +# Failure Rate: 100
Is failure rate is 100%, isn't it a fail than?
(I know we have other cases with Failure Rate: 100, maybe we should fix them as well)
Maybe I misunderstood the meaning of "Failure rate" for a flake.
I interpreted this as this test being flaky 100% of the time :)
Out of the 3 runs of the test, it passed 2/3 times and failed 1/3.
So its fail % actually is 33.33% in that case.
I think I saw a Failure rate of 100% on msm-sm8350-hdk-flakes.txt and
mistook that as the rate at which flakes are seen.
Let me fix this up as 33%
Regards,
Helen
> +# IGT Version: 1.28-ga73311079
> +# Linux Version: 6.12.0-rc2
> +kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo
>
> ---
> base-commit: 798bb342e0416d846cf67f4725a3428f39bfb96b
> change-id: 20241204-cursor_tor_skip-9d128dd62c4f
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
