Re: [PATCH] drm/ci: add kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo to apq8016 flakes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






---- On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 16:21:26 -0300 Abhinav Kumar  wrote ---

 > Hi Helen 
 >  
 > On 12/4/2024 11:14 AM, Helen Mae Koike Fornazier wrote: 
 > > Hi Abhinav, 
 > > 
 > > Thanks for your patch. 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > ---- On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:55:17 -0300 Abhinav Kumar  wrote --- 
 > > 
 > >   > From the jobs [1] and [2] of pipeline [3], its clear that 
 > >   > kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo is most certainly a flake and 
 > >   > not a fail for apq8016. Mark the test accordingly to match the results. 
 > >   > 
 > >   > [1] : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/67676481 
 > >   > [2] : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/67677430 
 > >   > [3]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/pipelines/1322770 
 > >   > 
 > >   > Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
 > >   > --- 
 > >   >  drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt | 5 +++++ 
 > >   >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) 
 > >   > 
 > >   > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt 
 > >   > new file mode 100644 
 > >   > index 000000000000..18639853f18f 
 > >   > --- /dev/null 
 > >   > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt 
 > >   > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ 
 > >   > +# Board Name: msm-apq8016-db410c 
 > >   > +# Failure Rate: 100 
 > > 
 > > Is failure rate is 100%, isn't it a fail than? 
 > > (I know we have other cases with Failure Rate: 100, maybe we should fix them as well) 
 > > 
 >  
 > Maybe I misunderstood the meaning of "Failure rate" for a flake. 
 >  
 > I interpreted this as this test being flaky 100% of the time :) 

Ah right, I see, inside deqp-runner (that auto-retries).

I'd like to hear Vignesh's opinion on this.

(In any case, we probably should document this better)

Regards,
Helen

 >  
 > Out of the 3 runs of the test, it passed 2/3 times and failed 1/3. 
 >  
 > So its fail % actually is 33.33% in that case. 
 >  
 > I think I saw a Failure rate of 100% on msm-sm8350-hdk-flakes.txt and 
 > mistook that as the rate at which flakes are seen. 
 >  
 > Let me fix this up as 33% 
 >  
 > > Regards, 
 > > Helen 
 > > 
 > >   > +# IGT Version: 1.28-ga73311079 
 > >   > +# Linux Version: 6.12.0-rc2 
 > >   > +kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo 
 > >   > 
 > >   > --- 
 > >   > base-commit: 798bb342e0416d846cf67f4725a3428f39bfb96b 
 > >   > change-id: 20241204-cursor_tor_skip-9d128dd62c4f 
 > >   > 
 > >   > Best regards, 
 > >   > -- 
 > >   > Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
 > >   > 
 > >   > 
 > > 
 > 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux