Re: [RFC PATCH v1 13/14] riscv: dts: Introduce power domain node with simple-bus compatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/12/2024 14:41, Michal Wilczynski wrote:
> The DRM Imagination GPU requires a power-domain driver, but the driver
> for "thead,th1520-aon" is not yet available. To ensure that the 'aon'
> node and its child 'pd' node are properly recognized and probed by the
> kernel, add "simple-bus" to the compatible property of the 'aon' node.
> 
> This change allows the kernel to treat the 'aon' node as a simple bus,
> enabling the child nodes to be probed and initialized independently. It
> ensures that the power domain can be managed appropriately until the
> specific AON driver is developed.
> 
> This commit introduces some errors while running dtbs_check, as the aon
> doesn't have the dt-bindings yet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi
> index 39d39059160d..58f93ad3eb6e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  
>  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/thead,th1520-clk.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/power/thead,th1520-power.h>
>  
>  / {
>  	compatible = "thead,th1520";
> @@ -229,6 +230,16 @@ stmmac_axi_config: stmmac-axi-config {
>  		snps,blen = <0 0 64 32 0 0 0>;
>  	};
>  
> +	aon {
> +		compatible = "thead,th1520-aon", "simple-bus";

1. No, that's not a bus.
2. Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Then
please run `scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict` and (probably) fix more
warnings. Some warnings can be ignored, especially from --strict run,
but the code here looks like it needs a fix. Feel free to get in touch
if the warning is not clear.

Sorry, this patchset is not ready, unless by RFC you meant - do not
review, because it is not ready. Then it is fine. But then *clearly
express* this in cover letter, so we know what you expect from us (and I
would not waste my time to go through all this).

Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux