Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/modes: introduce drm_mode_validate_mode() helper function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 02:30:53PM +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 08:36:01AM +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> > 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > 
> > > We probably need some kunit tests here too.
> > 
> > Good idea, will be my first :)
> > 
> 
> Would something like this work?
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_hdmi_state_helper_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_hdmi_state_helper_test.c
> index 294773342e71..26e4ff02df85 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_hdmi_state_helper_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_hdmi_state_helper_test.c
> @@ -1364,6 +1364,7 @@ static void drm_test_check_output_bpc_format_display_rgb_only(struct kunit *test
>  	struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
>  	struct drm_display_info *info;
>  	struct drm_display_mode *preferred;
> +	enum drm_mode_status mode_status;
>  	unsigned long long rate;
>  	struct drm_connector *conn;
>  	struct drm_device *drm;
> @@ -1408,6 +1409,9 @@ static void drm_test_check_output_bpc_format_display_rgb_only(struct kunit *test
>  	rate = drm_hdmi_compute_mode_clock(preferred, 12, HDMI_COLORSPACE_YUV422);
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_LT(test, rate, info->max_tmds_clock * 1000);
>  
> +	mode_status = drm_mode_check_pixel_clock(preferred, rate);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, mode_status, MODE_OK);
> +

Not really. You need to test that function, and ideally only that
function, with a bunch of random inputs, including the error conditions.

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux