On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 10:56:42AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/sharp-memory.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,681 @@
> …
> > +static int sharp_memory_maintain_display(struct sharp_memory_device *smd)
> > +{
> …
> > + u8 *tx_buffer = smd->tx_buffer;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&smd->tx_mutex);
> …
> > + mutex_unlock(&smd->tx_mutex);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> …
>
> Will development interests grow for the application of a statement
> like “guard(mutex)(&smd->tx_mutex);”?
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc1/source/include/linux/mutex.h#L201
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
