Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 0/9] Increase coverage on drm_framebuffer.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:31:08AM GMT, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2024, Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 21:15:25 -0300, Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho wrote:
> >> This patchset includes new KUnit tests for 5 untested functions from
> >> drm_framebuffer.c and improvements to the existent one.
> >> 
> >> The first patch replace the use of dev_private member from drm_device
> >> mock on the existent test by embedding it into an outer struct containing
> >> a generic pointer.
> >> 
> >> [...]
> >
> > Applied to misc/kernel.git (drm-misc-next).
> 
> How was this series itself tested? It would be prudent to Cc: intel-gfx
> on stuff like this to run it through our CI. I don't think it ever
> passed [1].

I'm not sure what's going on, but:

./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=drivers/gpu/drm//tests

Works like a charm with this series

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux