Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 0/9] Increase coverage on drm_framebuffer.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 11 Sep 2024, Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 21:15:25 -0300, Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho wrote:
>> This patchset includes new KUnit tests for 5 untested functions from
>> drm_framebuffer.c and improvements to the existent one.
>> 
>> The first patch replace the use of dev_private member from drm_device
>> mock on the existent test by embedding it into an outer struct containing
>> a generic pointer.
>> 
>> [...]
>
> Applied to misc/kernel.git (drm-misc-next).

How was this series itself tested? It would be prudent to Cc: intel-gfx
on stuff like this to run it through our CI. I don't think it ever
passed [1].

BR,
Jani.


[1] https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/shards-all.html?testfilter=drm_framebuffer



-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux