On Thu, 12 Sep 2024, Marc Gonzalez <mgonzalez@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/09/2024 12:23, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Sep 2024, Marc Gonzalez <mgonzalez@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 10/09/2024 16:51, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 01:03:43PM GMT, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>>> See also commit 6863f5643dd7 ("kbuild: allow Clang to find unused static
>>>>> inline functions for W=1 build").
[snip]
>> GCC doesn't catch unused static inlines, while Clang does.
>
> It makes no sense to me that adding "inline" would prevent
> GCC from diagnosing the issue... GCC should simply ignore
> the "inline" keyword when definition is not in a header file
> (maybe they don't store "origin").
Please just read the commit message for the commit I reference above for
details. There's not much more I could say about it.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
