On 29.07.24 10:47, Christian Heusel wrote:
> On 24/07/29 10:35AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>> [+Greg +stable]
>>
>> On 29.07.24 10:16, Lin, Wayne wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report.
>>>
>>> Patch fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()")
>>> is kind of correcting problems causing by commit:
>>> 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for mst mode validation")
>>>
>>> Sorry if it misses fixes tag and would suggest to backport to fix it. Thanks!
>>
>> Greg, seem it would be wise to pick up fa57924c76d995 for 6.10.y as
>> well, despite a lack of Fixes or stable tags.
>>
>> Ciao, Thorsten
>
> The issue is that the fixing commit does not apply to the 6.10 series
> without conflict and the offending commit does not revert cleanly
> aswell.
Hah, many thx, I should have checked that.
Lin, Wayne: could you maybe help out here and provide something for 6.10.y?
Ciao, Thorsten
