Re: [PATCH 11/15] RDMA/hbl: add habanalabs RDMA driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/18/24 19:01, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> On 6/18/24 13:08, Omer Shpigelman wrote:
>> On 6/17/24 22:04, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from leon@xxxxxxxxxx. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 05:43:49PM +0000, Omer Shpigelman wrote:
>>>> On 6/13/24 22:18, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>>> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from leon@xxxxxxxxxx. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 11:22:04AM +0300, Omer Shpigelman wrote:
>>>>>> Add an RDMA driver of Gaudi ASICs family for AI scaling.
>>>>>> The driver itself is agnostic to the ASIC in action, it operates according
>>>>>> to the capabilities that were passed on device initialization.
>>>>>> The device is initialized by the hbl_cn driver via auxiliary bus.
>>>>>> The driver also supports QP resource tracking and port/device HW counters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Omer Shpigelman <oshpigelman@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Abhilash K V <kvabhilash@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhilash K V <kvabhilash@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Andrey Agranovich <aagranovich@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Agranovich <aagranovich@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Bharat Jauhari <bjauhari@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bharat Jauhari <bjauhari@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: David Meriin <dmeriin@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Meriin <dmeriin@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Sagiv Ozeri <sozeri@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sagiv Ozeri <sozeri@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Zvika Yehudai <zyehudai@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zvika Yehudai <zyehudai@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> I afraid that you misinterpreted the "Co-developed-by" tag. All these
>>>>> people are probably touch the code and not actually sit together at
>>>>> the same room and write the code together. So, please remove the
>>>>> extensive "Co-developed-by" tags.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not full review yet, but simple pass-by-comments.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually except of two, all of the mentioned persons sat in the same room
>>>> and developed the code together.
>>>> The remaining two are located on a different site (but also together).
>>>> Isn't that what "Co-developed-by" tag for?
>>>> I wanted to give them credit for writing the code but I can remove if it's
>>>> not common.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by will be enough to give them credit.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, good enough.
>>
> 
> I would say that a lone sign-off give a little of credit compared to the
> co-developed-by tag. OTOH the list here is unusually long. What makes it
> even more tricky to evaluate is the fact that there is a lot of code ;)
> 
> So, I would suggest to re-evaluate this on your next (trimmed down)
> revisions.

You are right about the smaller credit Signed-off-by gives compared to
Co-developed-by, but yeah, the list is unusually long.
I'll try to split it to smaller patches and give credit only to the
specific persons involved.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux