Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/panel: novatek-nt36672a: stop calling regulator_set_load manually

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:08 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Use .init_load_uA part of the bulk regulator API instead of calling
> register_set_load() manually.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36672a.c | 11 +++--------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36672a.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36672a.c
> index 33fb3d715e54..3886372415c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36672a.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt36672a.c
> @@ -605,21 +605,16 @@ static int nt36672a_panel_add(struct nt36672a_panel *pinfo)
>         struct device *dev = &pinfo->link->dev;
>         int i, ret;
>
> -       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pinfo->supplies); i++)
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pinfo->supplies); i++) {
>                 pinfo->supplies[i].supply = nt36672a_regulator_names[i];
> +               pinfo->supplies[i].init_load_uA = nt36672a_regulator_enable_loads[i];
> +       }
>
>         ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(pinfo->supplies),
>                                       pinfo->supplies);
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get regulators\n");
>
> -       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pinfo->supplies); i++) {
> -               ret = regulator_set_load(pinfo->supplies[i].consumer,
> -                                        nt36672a_regulator_enable_loads[i]);
> -               if (ret)
> -                       return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to set regulator enable loads\n");
> -       }

Thanks for the cleanup! I happened to notice this commit and I'm
curious why you didn't take the next step and move to
devm_regulator_bulk_get_const(). That would have allowed you to avoid
the "for" loop above that copies the data ;-)

-Doug




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux