Re: [PATCH 0/3] refactor some ldb related clocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/21/2013 09:59 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hi Ying,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 06:08:48PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
>>> While I admit to having introduced the combination of 1/3.5 fixed
>>> divider and configurable 1/1,1/2 divder clocks to describe this
>>> fractional divider for the reasons you state, I think the correct
>>> solution would be to improve the table divider to support fractional
>>> values and get rid of the virtual ldb_di<n>_div_3_5 clocks, not
>>> introduce more virtual clocks.
>>
>> Yes, it's good to support fractional values for the table divider(not sure if there is any plan for this).
>> I see there is something similar in 'include/linux/sh_clk.h'.
> 
> Yeah, I agree with Philipp on improving table divider to support
> fractional values.  Would you like to work on that?
> 
> Shawn
> 

I don't have a plan to work on that now.

Liu Ying

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux