On 08/20/2013 11:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Liu Ying <Ying.Liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt >> index 5a90a72..90e923e 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt >> @@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ clocks and IDs. >> gpu3d_shader 74 >> ipu1_podf 75 >> ipu2_podf 76 >> - ldb_di0_podf 77 >> - ldb_di1_podf 78 >> ipu1_di0_pre 79 >> ipu1_di1_pre 80 >> ipu2_di0_pre 81 > > This causes a 'hole' in the clock numbering scheme: 74, 75, 76, 79, 80, etc > I find there is a 'hole' in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx5-clock.txt as well. The 'hole' was taken by tve_di(26) clock before. Is this more acceptable? ldb_di0_podf_unused 77 ldb_di1_podf_unused 78 Liu Ying _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
