Hi Ying, On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 06:08:48PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote: > > While I admit to having introduced the combination of 1/3.5 fixed > > divider and configurable 1/1,1/2 divder clocks to describe this > > fractional divider for the reasons you state, I think the correct > > solution would be to improve the table divider to support fractional > > values and get rid of the virtual ldb_di<n>_div_3_5 clocks, not > > introduce more virtual clocks. > > Yes, it's good to support fractional values for the table divider(not sure if there is any plan for this). > I see there is something similar in 'include/linux/sh_clk.h'. Yeah, I agree with Philipp on improving table divider to support fractional values. Would you like to work on that? Shawn _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
