On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 08:37:15AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 20/03/2024 18:04, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 07:28:55PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > >> + clock-names: > >> + items: > >> + - const: dp > > > >> + phy-names: > >> + items: > >> + - const: dp > > > > The items lists here are redundant when you only have a single item, no? > > Isnt it just > > phy-names: > > const: dp > > Somehow the convention for properties was to define the list. Unlike for > compatible where we use shorter syntax like you propose. Shall we change > the approach and use shorter syntax in general? I guess the difference is -names is usually more than 1 whereas compatible is frequently only 1. Either way is fine I think. Rob
