On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 6:26 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yo, > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 01:13:22PM +0000, Paweł Anikiel wrote: > > The Intel Displayport RX IP is a part of the DisplayPort Intel FPGA IP > > Core. It implements a DisplayPort 1.4 receiver capable of HBR3 video > > capture and Multi-Stream Transport. The user guide can be found here: > > > > https://www.intel.com/programmable/technical-pdfs/683273.pdf > > > > Signed-off-by: Paweł Anikiel <panikiel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/media/intel,dprx.yaml | 125 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/intel,dprx.yaml > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/intel,dprx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/intel,dprx.yaml > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..3ed37e0a4a94 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/intel,dprx.yaml > > @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause > > +%YAML 1.2 > > +--- > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/intel,dprx.yaml# > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > + > > +title: Intel DisplayPort RX IP > > + > > +maintainers: > > + - Paweł Anikiel <panikiel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > + > > +properties: > > + compatible: > > + const: intel,dprx > > Please version this compatible, given that is it for an FPGA IP. > I could not find an example of another intel IP that had versioning, but > there's plenty of xilinx stuff you can get inspiration from. The IP has had a few different revisions, so I decided to just use the "IP version" which is 20.0.1 for the version this driver is targeting. > > > + reg: > > + items: > > + - description: core registers > > + - description: irq registers > > + > > + interrupts: > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > + intel,has-mst: > > Mostly this looks fine, but this property drew my eye. > Firstly, I'd probably call this "intel,multi-stream-support" rather than > "intel,has-mst". Sure, > > > + type: boolean > > + description: The device supports Multi-Stream Transport > > Secondly, there are many many configuration parameters for this IP, > but you have chosen to document just one. > Are all other configuration parameters currently in their default > states or ignored by the driver? If not, please at least document all > configuration settings that you rely on - for example the max stream > count or audio packet encoding. I looked at all the parameters listed in the user guide, and most of them don't affect the driver. I listed the ones which are required, and added support for the remaining ones in v2. > > > + > > + port: > > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port > > + description: SST main link > > + > > + ports: > > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports > > + > > + properties: > > + port@0: > > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port > > + description: MST virtual channel 0 or SST main link > > + > > + port@1: > > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port > > + description: MST virtual channel 1 > > + > > + port@2: > > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port > > + description: MST virtual channel 2 > > + > > + port@3: > > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port > > + description: MST virtual channel 3 > > + > > +required: > > + - compatible > > + - reg > > + - interrupts > > + > > +allOf: > > + - if: > > + required: > > + - intel,has-mst > > + then: > > + required: > > + - ports > > + else: > > + required: > > + - port > > + > > +additionalProperties: false > > + > > +examples: > > + - | > > + dprx@c0062000 { > > "dprx" isn't a class of device, please try to use a generic node name > here. I couldn't find anything in the DT spec or any other similar examples, so I chose dp-receiver.